



by using git blame), citing them directly might be better. However, if you can clearly identify an individual who wrote the section that you're citing (e.g. A major contributor might decide not to (or forget to) list themselves as a copyright holder.Īm I safe to cite just "The Qt Company Ltd.
and after including includeThis is the starting point for all other Qt 5 courses on that are available on Udemy. Unfortunately, there is no hard-and-fast rule on this. To make it work i had to open: Extensions > Qt VS Tools > Qt Project Settings > Qt Project Settings (on the left) > Qt Modules and inside that check QT Widgets. This course uses C++ and Qt Creator which is the best IDE for developing cross platform applications using Qt that can run on Windows, Mac, Linux, embedded devices such as a raspberry pi, iPhone and Android. However, if a "secondary" contributor puts enough substantial work into a file, they might add their own name to the copyright list (e.g. Basically, you just copy QML files and related assets from the Qt UI Quick project (Design Studio project) to your qmake based application project (.pro project), and add them to Qt resource file (s) in it. Usually, copyright in the file is listed against the "main" contributor to that file. There is a chapter named Converting UI Projects to Applications in Qt Design Studio Manual.
#Qt creator student code#
If I scroll down I can see the docs, but there is nothing about an author being mentioned, just the copyright header at the top for "The Qt Company Ltd."ĭocumentation and source code are often written in the same file. Im looking at the sourcecode of qimage.cpp. However, other people could come along at a later time to improve the documentation Often (but not always), the person who wrote the code also wrote the original documentation. Im a bit confused about who wrote the docs.
